Institute of Imagination Liber
Work in progress

Liber.

What is being worked on now, what has been found, where things contradict each other, and the rules both sides of this are following. Nothing here is finished.

13
Activity records
42
Diagrams drawn
29 Aug
Science Fair
2
Taxonomies open

What I am working on

Event & Activity Planner

Holding iOi's core activities once, so events can be assembled from them.

Activity taxonomy

What an activity record is, the axes the thirteen really differ along, and how the same activity is rewritten for a teacher.

Open →

Event taxonomy

Seven axes across eleven events, the document hierarchy, and what the corpus cannot tell us.

Open →

How the diagrams work

Five marks, two canvases, no colour in the markup. Read off your own example boards.

Open →

ELM Science Fair

East London Mosque, Saturday 29 August 2026. Seven stations, nine activities.

The plan

Stations, activities, timings and the open questions.

Open →

Wind Tunnel

Five makes, twenty step panels. The fly half of Nature in Motion.

Open →

Junk Modelling Vehicles

Two chassis, three drives, one of which does not yet run. The roll half.

Open →

Rockets

Straw air rocket and balloon rocket. The only activity that throws something.

Open →

What was found

Renders

Adapting an activity for a teacher is three jobs, not one. The materials list and the challenge line are a filter a script can do. The technique text is the same facts at a different length. The hook, curriculum links, key stage, questions and outcomes exist nowhere upstream and are written fresh every time. Only the third is expensive.

Nothing has been evaluated

The corpus holds no post-delivery record of any event. The Marner teacher responses predate the Day of Play and ask only prospective questions. Meath Gardens' notes file is still empty two weeks after delivery. So no structure in the corpus is evidence of correctness, including the recent ones.

Stations are an ELM idea

Marner's unit is the classroom, 23 of them. Meath Gardens has neither stations nor classrooms. The station layer is real but describes one event, not the general shape.

No power source recorded

The wind tunnel has a fan and two glue guns. Across its 28 material rows there is no socket, no extension lead and no plug. Every other powered activity says how it is powered.

No floor for the rockets

A launch lane needs clear floor at an event expecting 400 visitors, and nothing on file describes the room. The safety controls are written but marked as proposed for that reason.

The confusion had a cause

Three activities are make, then test. They are exactly the three that were repeatedly mistaken for one another. It was treated as a naming problem; it was a category the record had no way to express.

The published page has drifted

Nature's Engineers is richer in the internal record than on the live website. Paxton, the Crystal Palace, the water lily and the James Webb telescope are in one and not the other.

The notation held

The drawing marks were only ever tested on paper. Dowel, straw, bottle cap, elastic band and balloon all worked, because a mark describes what a line means to the maker rather than what the thing is made of. One gap: nothing could say a rod runs through a tube.

Where things clash

None of these are resolved. They are listed so they can be, and several are only visible because two independent readings disagreed.

Contradictions in the data
Two column schemesEleven materials files use seven columns, two use nine. The validator meant to prevent this does not exist yet.
Event facts on activity recordsday_note is event scoped by decision and sits on 56 activity rows, so one record carries facts true of one venue on one day.
QuantitiesExist on one activity of thirteen. No pick list can be calculated for the other twelve.
Two volunteer rulesMarner says never unescorted, which needs an escort rota. ELM says never alone with children, which needs station cover. Both read from the same answer, and they cost different things.
No ratio anywhereAcross eleven events, no document states an adult to child ratio. Two state a headcount, on two different bases.
Contradictions in the words
One idea, three wordsThree activities on one station independently reached for flight, forces and movement. Deliberately left uncoined.
Opposite directionsno power and mains power describe the same property from opposite ends, so an activity carrying neither cannot be told from one nobody assessed.
Theme or tagFour words live as both. Nothing has ever settled what the two lists are for.
Near duplicatesglue gun against glue guns. nature and biomimicry always appearing together.
Contradictions I introduced
Two revision ordersThe taxonomies log newest at the bottom because I said so; the event plan logs newest first. My instruction, not a pre-existing split.
A pattern outlawed the same dayNature's Engineers opens with four figures of which two are empty. That was the house pattern in the morning and is not any more.
Rival notesThree agents wrote three overlapping method notes because none could safely edit another's file while running.

The rules

Two sets. The left is yours and settles what the work is. The right is mine and settles how it gets made without falling apart when several of me run at once.

Person rules

  • Never an em dash. Anywhere, including commit messages.
  • A page is a board you scan, not a document you read. If it reads as paragraphs it is wrong.
  • Blanks are the message, but not at the top. A phone shows very little, so the opening never spends space on something unknown. What is missing goes at the end.
  • Incompleteness is legal, guessing is not. A record may say only what is known. The calculator refuses; the file does not.
  • Nothing is finished, and may never be. Decisions will keep changing and have to update everywhere.
  • Halve the text. Substitute a diagram wherever one would carry it.
  • Free words for themes, with drift reported rather than prevented. Do not coin new ones just now.
  • Facilitators and volunteers are never one number. A volunteer is not DBS checked and is never left alone with children.
  • First names only on a page. The full record stays in the markdown.
  • Nothing is deleted. Superseded work moves, it does not vanish.

Robot rules

  • State a decision once and cite it. A paraphrase is a second copy that goes stale silently.
  • Mark every claim settled, proposed or open, so nobody has to do archaeology later.
  • Ink is the material, the accent is something you do to it. The sentence the whole drawing notation hangs on.
  • A cut is never drawn without its arrowhead. In greyscale it is otherwise indistinguishable from the material.
  • Draw axes, not a tree, unless the evidence genuinely stacks. A hierarchy asserts something a diagram cannot take back.
  • Event facts stay off an activity page. The activity says what it is, the event says how it is deployed.
  • Propose, never commit, in parallel. Three agents coining vocabulary at once produce exactly the drift the rule exists to catch.
  • Verify before repeating. An agent's confident finding is a claim, not a fact.
  • Never edit a file another running agent owns, and give scratch files a name nobody else would choose.
The two sets meet at one place. Your rule that nothing is finished is what makes my rule about citing rather than restating load bearing. If a decision will change, then every place it was paraphrased is a place it will be wrong, and the only way to keep that survivable is for the decision to live in one file and everything else to point at it.